• Welcome
    • Curriculum Vitae
    • About Me
  • Publications
    • Work in Progress
  • Blog
  • Provocations

WHAT HUMANISTS DO

1/14/2014

1 Comment

 

Coincidences, I have come to suspect,  point us in useful directions.  Superstition? Maybe, but listen to this.

In the mail pile, all wrapped up in antiseptic plastic, was the new Daedalus, edited by the formidable Denis Donoghue, who has marshaled the big names of the humanities to tell us “What Humanists Do.”  The answer came clear very quickly: humanists read and write about literary and theoretical  texts in English (and occasionally French or German), written after 1840 or so.   They may tip their hat to Vergil (Michael Putnam writes well about “Dido’s Long Dying”) and look for a while at Brancusi, Giacometti and de Kooning, but they don’t waste much time on art, archaeology, music, moral or political philosophy, or stuff outside the Euro-American world.  Humanists, by implication, are literary scholars who write  discursively within those chronological and cultural boundaries, and to judge from these essays by the all-star cast  Donoghue has put together,  they do it very well.

But next to the new Daedalus was that morning’s  Times, with a front page story by Ron Nordland on something quite different, the re-opening of the Kabul Museum. The Taliban had smashed everything they could get their grimy hands upon and looters and war lords had done the rest.   But thanks to the bravery  of the museum staff, customs officials, and others some of the collection has survived.    In the museum’s basement, moreover, scholars from  Chicago’s Oriental Institute, are compiling  a data base of the 11,000 objects that are still under the museum’s protective wing.  Once their catalogue is done, it will be a lot harder to raid the museum and smuggle the objects onto the world art market.  Stone age, Bronze age, Bactrian silver and gold, a  head of the Buddha.

So let’s ask, “What do these cataloguers do?”  They preserve the past, try to get the historical record right, make it accessible, help the rest of us understand something outside our own time and place.  Does that count, too?  Or is it just the already accessible near- present that is worthy of the name? After all, we humanists have expropriated that name from the scholars of what was once called  the Renaissance,  who did something very similar –they preserved a past that might otherwise have been lost or left in the great obscure.   If someone calls me a humanist, I think of those humanists, and feel humbled by what they were up against and what they achieved.  I would gladly share that name with those Chicago cataloguers who walk each day through the streets of Kabul to get on with the work of preserving a vulnerable past.  
1 Comment
Barbara Saylor Rodgers link
1/14/2014 06:39:26 pm

Thank you!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

    RSS Feed

    Picture